Chimps are not our relatives

The genomic similarity between humans and chimps is only 29.8% - Modern science doesn't support the theory of Evolution

For decades, people are fed with information that we are genetically more than 98 percent similar to chimpanzees. This weak argument has been used to convince people of evolution. Does modern science support this idea? Let us examine.

The comparison of genetic similarity is based on the so-called "protein coding genes", which are only about 1.5% of total DNA. But even if genetic equation would be 100%, we would not become apes, or apes wouldn't be humans. Human genes encoding proteins are very similar to kangaroos, mice, pigs, bats and many other animals due to the way the cell uses dna sections.

Serious science has investigated mechanisms that regulate and guide the morphological features of animals, ie bone size and shape, and other factors affecting appearance. Gene sequences, even protein encoding genes, do not regulate morphology. The shape and size of skull and skeleton are governed by epigenetic markers of histones, in particular acetylation / deacetylation and methylation markers. Histones are DNA compression proteins around which DNA is interwoven, enabling massive information to be compressed into a minimal small space. Epigenetic markers can be attached to the histones that function as if they were a biological database and an addressing system. They control and regulate eg. Protein production machines to select the correct DNA stretches for pre-mRNA and also control the alternative splicing mechanism.

The insertion of histones is associated with long non-coding RNA molecules during embryonic and fetal development. So if we really want to compare the similarity of chimpanzees and humans, we need to compare the similarity of lncRNA molecules. This is where the truth is revealed: the similarity of human and chimpanzee lncRNA molecules is ONLY 29.8% !!! So we have nothing to do with apes. This explains why organ transplants or blood transfusions do not work from chimpanzees to humans. As a whole, human epigenome differs from chimpanzees by more than 30%. According to evolutionary biology studies, our Y chromosome is "horrendously" different compared to chimps. Science does not know the kind of mechanism that could make an ape develop into a human being. Evolutionists need evidence of useful genetic mutations. But they can not be found. Instead, science can show us 203,885 disease-causing genomic mutations as evidence of rapid human genetic degradation. 73% of mutations in the human genome have occurred in the last 5,000 years. Evolutionary theory is the most pernicious heresy of our time. Do not get lost, good people.

Keywords:

skull morphogenesis histone deacetylase
skeletal morphology histone
human chimp lncrna differences

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Previous Sexual Partners Can Influence Another Male's Offspring

Image
Telegony (microchimerism) is not studied by pseudoscientists because it refutes the theory of evolution http://www.theneonnettle.com/features/1006-study-women-store-dna-from-every-male-they-have-sex-with "A new study by the University of Seattle and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has revealed that Women absorb and retain living DNA of every single man they have sex with. When scientists were trying to determine if women who had been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to diseases usually found in men, then also found in the study that the female brain also absorbs male DNA." "Le Dantec wrote that some farmer told him that once his swine copulated with a boar and their pigs absolutely resembled the father in color. But when the same swine copulated with another boar some pigs of the second farrow still resembled the color of the male pig the swine had copulated first."   http://modernnotion.com/is-telegony-real/ "Scientists believe the phe...
Read more

Early-stage embryos with abnormalities can still develop into healthy babies

Image
Early-stage embryos with abnormalities can still develop into healthy babies http://www.sanger.ac.uk/news/view/early-stage-embryos-abnormalities-can-still-develop-healthy-babies Excerpt: "Abnormal cells in the early embryo are not necessarily a sign that a baby will be born with a birth defect such as Down’s syndrome, suggests new research from the University of Cambridge, the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and the University of Leuven, Belgium. In a study published today (29 March) in the journal Nature Communications, scientists show that abnormal cells are eliminated and replaced by healthy cells, repairing – and in many cases completely fixing – the embryo. Researchers at the Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience at Cambridge report a mouse model of aneuploidy, where some cells in the embryo contain an abnormal number of chromosomes. Normally, each cell in the human embryo should contain 23 pairs of chromosomes (22 pairs of chromosomes and one pair of sex chr...
Read more

DNA methylation is directed by RNA

Image
Cellular differentiation, adaptation and variation of organisms is directed by RNA, not DNA https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24312289_RNA-directed_DNA_methylation_and_demethylation_in_plants Excerpt: "RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) is a nuclear process in which small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) direct the cytosine methylation of DNA sequences that are complementary to the siRNAs. In plants, double stranded-RNAs (dsRNAs) generated by RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 2 (RDR2) serve as precursors for Dicer-like 3 dependent biogenesis of 24-nt siRNAs. Plant specific RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) is presumed to generate the initial RNA transcripts that are substrates for RDR2. siRNAs are loaded onto an argonaute4-containing RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) that targets the de novo DNA methyltransferase DRM2 to RdDM target loci." My comment: There are only a few chemical modifications discovered on the DNA and histones; especially methylation and acetylation. But the list o...
Read more