Chimps are not our relatives
The genomic similarity between humans and chimps is only 29.8% - Modern science doesn't support the theory of Evolution
For decades, people are fed with information that we are genetically more than 98 percent similar to chimpanzees. This weak argument has been used to convince people of evolution. Does modern science support this idea? Let us examine.
The comparison of genetic similarity is based on the so-called "protein coding genes", which are only about 1.5% of total DNA. But even if genetic equation would be 100%, we would not become apes, or apes wouldn't be humans. Human genes encoding proteins are very similar to kangaroos, mice, pigs, bats and many other animals due to the way the cell uses dna sections.
Serious science has investigated mechanisms that regulate and guide the morphological features of animals, ie bone size and shape, and other factors affecting appearance. Gene sequences, even protein encoding genes, do not regulate morphology. The shape and size of skull and skeleton are governed by epigenetic markers of histones, in particular acetylation / deacetylation and methylation markers. Histones are DNA compression proteins around which DNA is interwoven, enabling massive information to be compressed into a minimal small space. Epigenetic markers can be attached to the histones that function as if they were a biological database and an addressing system. They control and regulate eg. Protein production machines to select the correct DNA stretches for pre-mRNA and also control the alternative splicing mechanism.The comparison of genetic similarity is based on the so-called "protein coding genes", which are only about 1.5% of total DNA. But even if genetic equation would be 100%, we would not become apes, or apes wouldn't be humans. Human genes encoding proteins are very similar to kangaroos, mice, pigs, bats and many other animals due to the way the cell uses dna sections.
Keywords:
skull morphogenesis histone deacetylase
skeletal morphology histone
human chimp lncrna differences
Comments
Post a Comment