A comparison of two models of the origin of life and biodiversity

A comparison of two models of the origin of life and biodiversity


Darwinian tree of life
Creation orchard




A hypothetical model. Never observed.
Observational science.
Requires increase of biological information, new structures and functions. Never observed.
Genetic mutations are mostly harmful errors and result in degradation and loss of biological information. Genes are driven by life(style). Observed science.
Based on an assumption that organisms experience positive changes through random mutations and selection. Genes are drivers. Never observed.
Variation of organisms is based on existing information = Epigenetic mechanisms are induced by nutrition, climate, stress and other environmental factors. Observed science.
Not supported by the fossil record. A serious lack of the most important transitional fossils. Still missing link between apes and humans. The assumed ancestor of primates?
Confirmed by the fossil record. Fossils point to a global, catastrophic event and rapid burials.
Not supported by modern science, because:
- There are no mechanisms leading to simultaneous and synchronized increase of different forms (digital, analog, metadata) of biological information.
Supported by modern science, because:
- Changes in organisms are based on epigenetic mechanisms or loss of biological information.
Biggest problems:
- Abiogenesis
- Dinosaur bones’ soft tissues.
- 203,000 disease-causing genetic defects in the human DNA.
- Dog breeding shows the results of variation: a dead end.
- Molecular mechanisms and language of DNA are way too complex. Random lottery is not able to build such intelligent mechanisms.
- Receptors, signals and response regulators! Irreducible complexity.
Biggest problems:
- The most of created kinds are extinct.
Conclusion: Darwinian tree of life is not based on science.
Conclusion: Creation orchard is supported by discoveries made by modern science.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Previous Sexual Partners Can Influence Another Male's Offspring

Image
Telegony (microchimerism) is not studied by pseudoscientists because it refutes the theory of evolution http://www.theneonnettle.com/features/1006-study-women-store-dna-from-every-male-they-have-sex-with "A new study by the University of Seattle and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has revealed that Women absorb and retain living DNA of every single man they have sex with. When scientists were trying to determine if women who had been pregnant with a son might be more predisposed to diseases usually found in men, then also found in the study that the female brain also absorbs male DNA." "Le Dantec wrote that some farmer told him that once his swine copulated with a boar and their pigs absolutely resembled the father in color. But when the same swine copulated with another boar some pigs of the second farrow still resembled the color of the male pig the swine had copulated first."   http://modernnotion.com/is-telegony-real/ "Scientists believe the phe...
Read more

Early-stage embryos with abnormalities can still develop into healthy babies

Image
Early-stage embryos with abnormalities can still develop into healthy babies http://www.sanger.ac.uk/news/view/early-stage-embryos-abnormalities-can-still-develop-healthy-babies Excerpt: "Abnormal cells in the early embryo are not necessarily a sign that a baby will be born with a birth defect such as Down’s syndrome, suggests new research from the University of Cambridge, the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute and the University of Leuven, Belgium. In a study published today (29 March) in the journal Nature Communications, scientists show that abnormal cells are eliminated and replaced by healthy cells, repairing – and in many cases completely fixing – the embryo. Researchers at the Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience at Cambridge report a mouse model of aneuploidy, where some cells in the embryo contain an abnormal number of chromosomes. Normally, each cell in the human embryo should contain 23 pairs of chromosomes (22 pairs of chromosomes and one pair of sex chr...
Read more

DNA methylation is directed by RNA

Image
Cellular differentiation, adaptation and variation of organisms is directed by RNA, not DNA https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24312289_RNA-directed_DNA_methylation_and_demethylation_in_plants Excerpt: "RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) is a nuclear process in which small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) direct the cytosine methylation of DNA sequences that are complementary to the siRNAs. In plants, double stranded-RNAs (dsRNAs) generated by RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 2 (RDR2) serve as precursors for Dicer-like 3 dependent biogenesis of 24-nt siRNAs. Plant specific RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV) is presumed to generate the initial RNA transcripts that are substrates for RDR2. siRNAs are loaded onto an argonaute4-containing RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex) that targets the de novo DNA methyltransferase DRM2 to RdDM target loci." My comment: There are only a few chemical modifications discovered on the DNA and histones; especially methylation and acetylation. But the list o...
Read more