‘Junk DNA’ no more? Most long non-coding RNA likely functional, study finds
The number of functional long non-coding RNAs exceeds the number of protein coding genes present in human cells
https://epigeneticsliteracyproject.org/junk-dna-no-long-non-coding-rna-functional-study-finds/Excerpt: "Researchers have now catalogued nearly 28,000 long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) present in human cells, and found that roughly 20,000 are likely functional. The study, published yesterday (March 1, 2017) in Nature, also suggests that about 2,000 lncRNAs are associated with diseases."
http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/cat/?cultureKey=&q=cat
http://www.whatisepigenetics.com/non-coding-rna/
Excerpt: "Many lncRNAs can complex with chromatin-modifying proteins and recruit their catalytic activity to specific sites in the genome, thereby modifying chromatin states and influencing gene expression. The majority of non-coding RNA transcripts belong to the group lncRNAs. Long ncRNAs function in chromatin remodeling, transcriptional regulation, post-transcriptional regulation, and as precursors for siRNAs."
My comment: Long non-coding RNA molecules have several epigenetic jobs in regulating gene expression, chromatin structure and cellular identity. Most lncRNAs originate from enhancers, that are typically methylated regions of certain genes. Both long and small ncRNAs can also impact on epigenetic programs. Epigenetic patterns can be transmitted from one cell to the daughter cell, but, importantly, also through generations.
Long non-coding RNAs don't support the theory of evolution. For example, only 880 lncRNAs were similar between a mouse and a human cell. And a comparison of a human-chimp lncRNAs doesn't give any better results. This is again bad news for proponents of the theory of evolution.
https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-016-0880-9
Sshh, Darwin didn't know about this.
Comments
Post a Comment