Most immune responses are genetic, very personalised and finely tuned
Immune system associated genes don't change due to random mutations
The study published today in Nature Communications, adds to a growing body of evidence that the genetic influence on our immune system is significantly higher than previously thought.
Researchers from King's, supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' Foundation Trust and King's College London, analysed 23,000 immune traits in 497 adult female twins from the TwinsUK cohort. They found that adaptive immune traits - the more complex responses that develop after exposure to a specific pathogen, such as chickenpox - are mostly influenced by genetics.
They also highlight the importance of environmental influences such as our diet, on shaping the innate immunity (the simple core immune response found in all animals) in adult life.The findings could help to improve understanding of the immune system and the interaction of environmental factors. It could also form the basis of further research into treatments for various diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis.
Dr Massimo Mangino, lead researcher from King's College London said: 'Our genetic analysis resulted in some unusual findings, where adaptive immune responses, which are far more complex in nature, appear to be more influenced by variations in the genome than we had previously thought. In contrast, variation in innate responses (the simple non specific immune response) more often arose from environmental differences. This discovery could have a significant impact in treating a number of autoimmune diseases.'
Professor Tim Spector, Director of the TwinsUK Registry at King's College London said: 'Our results surprisingly showed how most immune responses are genetic, very personalised and finely tuned. What this means is that we are likely to respond in a very individualised way to an infection such as a virus - or an allergen such as a house dust mite causing asthma. This may have big implications for future personalised therapy.'
My comment: Yes, genes can be changed. But genes are changed if there is a need for the change. Immune system uses several complex mechanisms where epigenetic factors are tightly linked with genetic factors. They function at individual level and are influenced by environmental elements, typically diet. That's why twins may have very different shapes of innate immune system.
CpG island methylation can be mentioned as an example of an epigenetic mechanism within immune system.
RNA-mediated cellular mechanisms can cause gene sequence alterations by using the following mechanisms in CpG island rich genes, for example:
a. Hypermethylated cytosine turns to thymine.
b. Hydroxymethylated cytosine turns to guanine.
However, these substitutions at single nucleotide level don't increase genomic information. They don't lead to increase of functional or structural complexity. Large scale evolution has no mechanism. There is not such a thing as mutation driven evolution. Genes are not drivers, they are followers. Gene centric evolutionary theory is a dangerous heresy.
However, these substitutions at single nucleotide level don't increase genomic information. They don't lead to increase of functional or structural complexity. Large scale evolution has no mechanism. There is not such a thing as mutation driven evolution. Genes are not drivers, they are followers. Gene centric evolutionary theory is a dangerous heresy.
Comments
Post a Comment